Vaccine Candidates for RSV Ward Off Severe Illness in Older Adults

Vaccine Candidates for RSV Ward Off Severe Illness in Older Adults

WASHINGTON — Prefusion F protein vaccine candidates for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) proved protected in adults 60 and up while demonstrating a functionality to thwart lower respiratory tract sickness, together with excessive cases, a pair of gargantuan part III trials showed.

A single dose of an RSV prefusion F protein vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) yielded a vaccine efficacy of 82.6% against lower respiratory tract sickness (96.95% CI 57.9-94.1), meeting the glimpse’s predominant endpoint, and vaccine efficacy landed at 94.1% against excessive RSV sickness (95% CI 62.4-99.9), reported Michael Ison, MD, MS, of Northwestern University Feinberg Faculty of Medication in Chicago, at the annual IDWeek meeting.

Within the 2nd trial, a single dose of one other RSV prefusion F protein vaccine (RSVPreF) showed an efficacy of 66.7% against two or extra lower respiratory tract RSV signs (96.66% CI 28.8-85.8) and 85.7% against three or extra signs (96.66% CI 32.0-98.7), meeting the co-predominant endpoints of the glimpse, in step with Edward Walsh, MD, of the University of Rochester in Fresh York.

For the time being, no vaccines exist to give protection to against RSV infection. Per records from the CDC, an estimated 177,000 older adults in the U.S. were hospitalized as a result of RSV infections in 2017 on my own, and 14,000 died.

“For somebody that is been working in the discipline for a extremely very long time, I might perchance no longer be extra the advances we’re seeing, critically with the respiratory syncytial virus vaccines,” mentioned session moderator Kathleen Neuzil, MD, of the University of Maryland in Baltimore, introducing the predicted trials.


The part III AReSVi-006 (Adult Respiratory Syncytial Virus) trial of RSVPreF3 OA presented by Ison included 24,960 adults age 60 and older (imply 69.5 years) who were randomized 1:1 to the vaccine or placebo. Case definition for the glimpse used to be the presence of lower respiratory signs or signs for no longer no longer as a lot as 24 hours along with RSV detected by RT-PCR. By this definition, seven folk who purchased the vaccine developed lower respiratory tract sickness from RSV versus 40 among placebo recipients.

Severe cases engaging at the least two lower respiratory signs or assessed as excessive by the investigator and confirmed by the exterior adjudication committee, or used to be in step with use of supportive therapy. One case of excessive lower respiratory tract sickness occurred in the vaccine community and 17 occurred in the placebo community.

The treatment and placebo teams were in an identical trend matched for age: 56% were 60-69 years, 36% age 70-79 years, and 8% were 80 and older. Most members were white (about 79%), while 9% were Dark, and 7.6% were Asian.

For the principle endpoint, the vaccine conducted in an identical trend all the way in which thru RSV subgroups and age teams:

  • RSV A: 84.6%
  • RSV B: 80.9%
  • Age 60-69 years: 81.0%
  • Age 70-79 years: 93.8%

In folk 80 and up, and those that were outdated-fashioned, too few cases occurred to evaluate efficacy, in step with Ison. Efficacy against lower respiratory tract sickness seemed constant regardless of comorbidity location (72.5% for none and 94.6% for one or extra) and used to be 92.9% for those deemed pre-outdated-fashioned and 80% for those deemed fit.

Baseline comorbidities were reported in unbiased under 40% of members, and included continual obstructive pulmonary illness (COPD), asthma, any continual respiratory/pulmonary illness, continual heart failure, diabetes, and stepped forward liver or renal illness.

The protection profile used to be lawful, Ison mentioned. Antagonistic events (AEs) included arm ache, fatigue, headache, and myalgia that “most continuously resolved in a transient time,” he added. No imbalances were seen for excessive AEs.


The part III RENOIR trial included 34,284 members age 60 and up (imply age 68.3 years). Walsh presented an intervening time prognosis of the trial with about 6 months of apply-up.

For the two-symptom endpoint, 11 cases of lower respiratory tract sickness occurred in the treatment community versus 33 in the placebo community, with signs together with cough, wheezing, sputum production, shortness of breath, sore throat, nasal congestion, and nasal discharge. For the three-symptom endpoint, two cases occurred in the vaccine arm versus 14 among controls.

All members were in lawful effectively being or had stable continual clinical prerequisites, Edwards mentioned, and folk with immunocompromising prerequisites were excluded.

Contributors had an moderate age of 68 years, about 78% were white, 37% Hispanic, 8% were Dark, and 8% were Asian. Age teams another time were smartly matched: 63% were ages 60-69 years, 32% were 70-79 years, and 6% were 80 and up.

High-possibility prerequisites included continual cardiopulmonary prerequisites in 15-16%, asthma in 9%, COPD in 6%, and congestive heart failure in 2%. Furthermore, 19% had diabetes and 13% had heart illness.

Local reactions, together with injection inform ache, redness, and swelling were seen in 12.1% of the treatment community versus 6.6% of the placebo community. AEs total were seen in 27.4% versus 25.7%, respectively — these included local ache at the positioning of vaccination, fatigue, headache, muscle ache, joint ache, diarrhea, fever, nausea, and vomiting.

In his presentation, Edwards confirmed the insist COVID prompted for the trial, which started in August 2021 at his heart.

“This used to be the worst likely time to flee an efficacy trial for non-COVID sickness,” he mentioned. “Internal our heart we had extra COVID than other kinds of respiratory infections.”

Both trials will document 1-year apply-up records when accessible.

  • creator['full_name']

    Ingrid Hein is a crew creator for MedPage This day maintaining infectious illness. She has been a clinical reporter for bigger than a decade. Apply


The RENOIR glimpse used to be funded by Pfizer, while AReSVi-006 used to be funded by GSK.

Walsh reported relationships with Merck and Pfizer. Multiple coinvestigators are Pfizer staff or shareholders.

Ison declared relationships with GSK, Adagio Therapeutics, Adamis Pharmaceuticals, ADMA Biologics, AlloVir, Atea Pharmaceuticals, Cidara Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Genentech/Roche, Janssen, Merck, Pulmocide, Shionogi, Seqirus, Takeda, Talaris Therapeutics, and Viracor Eurofins. Multiple coinvestigators are GSK staff or shareholders.